Articles

Vaccine Skeptics Have Their Say

Back to ArticlesArticles
Vaccine Skeptics Have Their Say about undefined

by Andrew Scholberg

This is the second of two reports on Ty Bollinger's 2019 “The Truth About Cancer [LIVE]” conference at the Hilton Hotel in Anaheim, California. Again, a reminder that the views and opinions expressed at this conference are those of the speakers. If you missed the first article, read it here.

Here's how Ty Bollinger introduced Del Bigtree, a passionate advocate for health freedom: “For six years he was the Emmy Award winning producer of 'The Doctors.' His investigation into the wrongful destruction of Dr. Andrew Wakefield's career orchestrated by Big Pharma and the UK Department of Health inspired him to focus all of his attention on producing 'Vaxxed: From Cover Up to Catastrophe.'”

Adam Schiff and Amazon censor truth

Mr. Bigtree had a contract with Amazon to offer "Vaxxed" on Amazon Prime for freeuntil the end of time. Enter Congressman Adam Schiff (Democrat,California), who, you may remember, was famous for saying he had evidence that Donald Trump had “colluded” with the Russians – rather odd in view of the fact that his House committee never brought the charges.

Even anti-Trumpers must have wondered what happened, after having been assured the whole matter was open and shut. It's hardly surprising that this character is a puppet of the drug companies.

Rep. Schiff sent a letter to Amazon founder Jeff Bezos making the false allegation that “Vaxxed” contained misinformation. Amazon dutifully fell into line with Big Pharma, broke their contract with Mr. Bigtree, and yanked “Vaxxed” in an act of censorship.

And, again, we shouldn’t be surprised in that Mr. Bezos owns the Washington Post and shares the views of Rep. Schiff on a whole range of topics.

Mr. Bigtree also described another blow to health freedom: California's law that forces parents to have their children vaccinated even in cases where a child has a medical exemption! He remarked, “In California your doctor cannot protect you from the pharmaceutical industry, and now children are going to die in California [because of mandatory vaccinations].”

The science is settled! 

Mr. Bigtree said, “Here are the slogans that we always hear: 'vaccines are safe and effective,' 'vaccine injury is rare,' and my favorite, 'the science is settled.' Let's take a look at 'the science.'

In 2017, Dr. Peter Hotez, who was involved in designing the vaccine programs for the underdeveloped world, decided to do the study anti-vaxxers have been asking for: comparing vaccinated children to totally unvaccinated children.

“We've been saying: don't keep telling us vaccination makes us healthier,” Mr. Bigtree told the audience.  “Prove it. Prove it. Use the scientific method. Go ahead. We're all open for it.”

So Dr. Hotez did just that. He looked at a DPT (diptheria, pertussis, tetanus) vaccine program that took place 30 years earlier in the Republic of Guinea, Africa.

The original plan of this DPT vaccination program was to vaccinate every child in the area. But because of the difficulties of reaching every child in every village by the end of that year, only half of the children had been vaccinated — almost exactly half. The other half remained unvaccinated.

Thus, thanks to logistical difficulties and time constraints, this program turned out by accident to be totally randomized. It provided a serviceable population for comparing the death rate of the vaccinated with the death rate of the unvaccinated. What were the results?

DPT-vaccinated children
had a mortality rate five-fold higher! 

The DPT-vaccinated children had a mortality rate five-fold higher than the unvaccinated children! In other words, at least five times more vaccinated children died of all causes — not just DPT — than unvaccinated children. Here is the reference for that study:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360569/

Mr. Bigtree continued, “But it gets even worse. The death rate was ten times higher for the children who only got the DPT vaccine. Children who also got the live polio vaccine by mouth at the same time, for some reason, had a death rate that was only five-fold higher” than the death rate for unvaccinated children. Bigtree urged his listeners not to take his word for it but to take the word of Dr. Peter Hotez.

As longtime Cancer Defeated readers know, “all-cause mortality” is one of the most meaningful stats for comparing a treatment or lifestyle choice to the absence of the same, because death is a pretty hard event for either advocates or opponents to fix or fudge, and because all-cause mortality captures any side effects a treatment or other choice may have.

For example, it might well be that the vaccinated population had lower rates of illness or death from diptheria, pertussis and tetanus. In fact, it’s likely. But by looking at ALL causes of death we see convincing evidence that the vaccine was extremely harmful in some way we would never discover if we look only at those three diseases.

Live oral vaccines compared
to injections of dead microbes 

This study surely suggests the DPT vaccine is too dangerous to inject into children, unless the goal is to weaken their overall health and promote premature death. But how did the oral polio vaccine moderate the devastating lethal effect of the DPT vaccine so dramatically: causing the death rate to drop from a ten-fold increase to five-fold? That does seem odd.

The oral polio vaccine is a live vaccine that seems to stimulate, educate, and strengthen the immune system in a general way, offering a wide range of health benefits with little or no downside. Thus, this live vaccine apparently protects people not just from polio but also helps to protect against other health threats.

It turns out that there's a vast difference between live oral vaccines and vaccine injections. Practically all vaccines given today are injections containing substances that can weaken overall health; the injections provide limited and questionable benefits and bad consequences.

By contrast, according to Mr. Bigtree, live vaccines taken by mouth seem to offer general benefits with no significant downside. Unfortunately, live oral vaccines are disappearing or perhaps have already become a thing of the past.

He cited a link to a superb 17-minute TED talk by a distinguished international physician who clearly explains the benefits of live oral vaccines, in contrast to vaccine injections:

To find the TED Talk cited by Mr. Bigtree, go to Youtube and do a search for Christine Stabell Benn. The title of the video is "How vaccines train the immune system in ways no one expected."

What's the overall effect of vaccine injections on health? Mr. Bigtree told the attendees, “In 1986 we were giving 11 vaccines. Now we're giving 54 — in 72 doses. In that same time period, the chronic illness rate in our children skyrocketed from 12.8 percent to 54 percent. Folks, that is the greatest decline in human health in recorded history, period.

“The U.S. has highest first-day infant mortality of the industrialized world. In fact, we have 50 percent more babies die on the first day of life than every other industrialized nation combined. We have more babies dying the first year of life than the 20 other richest nations in the world. I'm not making that up. Time magazine's reporting it. American kids are now 70 percent more likely to die before reaching adulthood than kids in other rich countries. How many people thought we had the best medical system in the world?”

Generally, the medical establishment attributes our high infant mortality rate to inadequate prenatal care among the poor and addicted, and to similar socioeconomic reasons. Cancer Defeated has not investigated this issue, but Mr. Bigtree’s information suggests that vaccination may at least play a role.

Vaccinations and childhood cancer 

As you may know, children get a major round of vaccinations at age five. Mr. Bigtree noted there's a “big uptick in pediatric cancer starting at age six.” This uptick should be reason enough to pause the vaccination program until the safety of the vaccines has been proven.

He went on to add, “Of course, the pharmaceutical establishment assures the public that all vaccinations are safe and should be taken by all children. They further soothe the public with the claim, repeated over and over, that the alleged link between vaccinations and autism has been 'debunked.' Anybody who questions or disputes these assurances is considered a 'denier' and a tinfoil-hat wearing conspiracy theorist.”

So many parents distrust or disbelieve Big Pharma's self-serving assurances about vaccine safety that draconian consequences are being enforced to make sure all parents knuckle under and get their children vaccinated. But when children are harmed, the vaccination enforcers just shrug it off as collateral damage. Meanwhile, mandatory vaccinations continue unabated.

Mr. Bigtree pointed out that no childhood vaccine given today has ever been tested against an inert placebo. He said, “You are all a part of a giant human experiment, like every child in America's vaccine program, which brings me to the Nuremberg Code. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. What do you call it when they say you can't put your child in a public or private school if the child doesn’t have all their vaccinations? Coercion. The United States government is currently breaking the Nuremberg Code as we speak.”

How can mercury be good for children's health? 

The speaker who addressed the subject of vaccine toxicity was Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, an osteopathic physician who founded the Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center near Cleveland, Ohio. She drew attention to the incredibly heavy and ever-growing schedule of vaccines that the American medical establishment recommends for all children.

Dr. Tenpenny said, “A fully vaccinated child that gets every dose of vaccination, every dose of vaccine from birth to 18 years of age, has 12,000 micrograms of aluminum and 585 micrograms of mercury injected.”

[A microgram is a millionth of a gram, which in turn is about one-twenty-eighth of an ounce, so this amount is very small. But no dose of mercury is considered safe, and it is known to be damaging in microscopic doses.

As a point of comparison, a typical tuna fish is said to contain about 400 micrograms of mercury per kilogram (2.2 pounds).]

Mercury is one of the most poisonous substances known to man: a known cause of degenerative diseases. Aluminum, in large amounts, is also toxic, although it’s ubiquitous in the environment and natural for humans to have small amounts in their bodies. She asserted that it makes no sense to inject so much toxicity into children. If you've ever wondered why so many children are getting cancers today compared to, say, 50 years ago, the toxic substances in vaccines may be among the culprits.

Cancer Defeated comment: As noted in Part I of this article, the number of vaccinations inflicted on babies and toddlers in the United States is insane. Many of these vaccinations are for diseases so rare you probably can’t find a doctor in your town who has ever seen a single case – and in many cases the diseases were rare BEFORE vaccination became common. The over-vaccination of small children is, by itself, reason enough to reject the current medical regime in the United States. (Another is the deliberate effort to suppress the drug combo of hydroxychloroquine and Zithromax, a treatment for covid-19 that is known, on the basis of decades of use, to be safe and which we now know on the basis of abundant cases is effective against the virus. It is hard to believe, in the face of these policies, that mainstream medicine is not corrupt and utterly blinded by its own habits and self-interest.)

Known carcinogen in flu vaccine 

Dr. Tenpenny added that known carcinogens in common vaccines also include the highly toxic chemical Beta-Propiolactone and Triton X-100, which is a detergent that's used primarily in flu shots. When injected inside the body, Triton X-100 breaks down into ethylene oxide, which California authorities identify as a known carcinogen that's supposed to be listed on the label. Dr. Tenpenny asked, “Do you hear that about flu shots anywhere? No, not at all.”

[Comment:  California is extremely strict about labeling a substance a carcinogen, and they do so at doses so low the substance is known to be safe.  It’s the dose that makes the poison, and the relevant question is how high a dose of Triton X-100 is required to be toxic. California requires that many if not most supplements all of us take are now required to be labeled “contains carcinogens.”]

Dr. Tenpenny also drew attention to problems caused by vaccine substances that come from parts of chickens and cows and even from monkey kidney cells. She finds it bizarre and concerning that such animal substances are routinely injected into people.

She highly recommends the book The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of the Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, the Contaminated Polio Vaccine and the Millions of Americans Exposed, by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher.

Dr. Tenpenny complained, “They now use dog cells to create certain flu shots. They took kidney cells out of a healthy cocker spaniel, and they made them divide in perpetuity forever, and a cell that propagates in perpetuity by definition is a cancer cell. They take cancer cells and they use them to make vaccines.” She pointed out that cells from an aborted human baby are also used. Dr. Tenpenny concluded her talk by saying, “We need to call for a complete moratorium on all this nonsense.”

Ty Bollinger, the organizer of the conference, made some observations about the vaccination controversy. He said, “It's interesting with vaccines that if you want to have better studies, if you want to actually get more research done so that you could have a safer vaccine, you're called an anti-vaxxer or somebody who hates science.

“Actually, what you're calling for is more science and more safety! If you dare to call for more safety studies on vaccines, you're called an 'anti-vaxxer quack.' If you dare to say that we should do more research to make sure that our children are not being harmed, you're called dangerous.”

Mr. Bollinger introduced Dr. Andrew Wakefield with these words: “Dr. Wakefield was made a fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists in 2001. He has published over 140 original scientific articles, books, and book chapters.

“In his pursuit of discovering the truth about possible links between childhood vaccines, intestinal inflammation, and neurological injury in children, he lost his job in the Department of Medicine at London's Royal Free Hospital. He lost his country, he lost his career, he lost his fellowships, and he lost his medical license, all in an effort to save children. He's the co-founder of Autism Media Channel. He's the director and the co-writer of Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe.”

Comment: Dr. Wakefield is one of the most controversial physicians in recent history. In 1998 he published an article in the prestigious British medical journal Lancet demonstrating a link between the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine and autism. The study was very small, with only 12 participants, and the press later raised allegations that the children were involved in a lawsuit against MMR vaccine makers.

The Lancet later retracted the article in the wake of allegations of misconduct from Britain’s General Medical Council, which sets standards for students and doctors. Cancer Defeated expresses no opinion in this controversy but wants readers to understand that this subject is highly complicated and contentious.

Big Pharma's “perfect business model” 

At The Truth about Cancer conference, Dr. Wakefield said, “In 1986, when Ronald Reagan signed into law The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, what it created for the pharmaceutical industry was the perfect business model. They had a mandatory market, your children had to get vaccinated, and they had no liability!

“All they could do is make an enormous profit, and they've certainly done that. Not only out of the vaccines, but even more so out of the injuries caused by the vaccines. They clean up at the front end, they clean up at the back end.”

He asked what incentive the drug companies have to make a vaccine safer when they're making so much money on the failures. “Why would they improve it? Well, they wouldn't, and they don't, and they never will.”

Right now, we're seeing an extraordinary push for mandatory vaccination. California passed perhaps America's most draconian law requiring vaccinations with no opt-outs for medical reasons. In other words, even when a patient's physician knows a required vaccination will harm his patient, the patient still must get the toxic vaccination against medical judgment. This law crosses the line by making the government, rather than the physician, the arbiter of which treatment is appropriate. Other states may well follow suit.

The reason for the strong and urgent push for mandatory vaccination, according to Dr. Wakefield, is that “the pharmaceutical industry and its acolytes are in a race against time because the truth is their vaccines have failed. Almost universally across the board, their vaccines have failed, and woe betide them when the world finds out.

“The industry knows it. And the world is finding out. And they have to force vaccination before the world comes to realize the case or they will not be able to get those mandates through.”

You've probably seen hysterical headlines like this: “Anti-vaccine movement causes the worst whooping cough epidemic in 70 years.” Dr. Wakefield pointed out that the mainstream media and Big Pharma routinely lay the blame on those who are vaccine-safety aware, whom they label 'anti-vaxxers.'”

“We'll all sit down to a banquet of consequences” 

Dr. Wakefield declared, “Fifty thousand people are dying every year in Europe and the U.S. from infections that antibiotics have lost the ability to kill. Not only is this going to happen with vaccines; we're already there. Diseases are becoming tougher, and vaccines aren't able to keep pace with the speed with which diseases are becoming tougher. In just 80 years we've gone from the miracle of penicillin to apocalypse.”

To put things into historical perspective, Dr. Wakefield cited a 1961 quote from Sir Graham Wilson, Fellow of the Royal Society from England, one of the world's foremost microbiologists. In a public speech, Sir Graham said, “Measles is one of the inevitable but relatively unimportant maladies of childhood. In England, and I dare say the U.S., one in 100,000 dies. In Scandinavia, this is one in a million.”

Yet a massive campaign for measles vaccination, which is now mandatory, was launched for a disease that had dwindled into a minor problem because of natural herd immunity, which the vaccination has destroyed.

See the first article in this series for an explanation of how herd immunity had been achieved by the early 1960s.

Regarding the push for mandatory vaccination, Dr. Wakefield said, “We need to refuse as one. We need to stand together, whatever the price, whatever the consequence, because we will leave behind for our children, our grandchildren, our great grandchildren, an utter catastrophe. It will make 1984 look like playtime. And so, it has to happen now!”

In concluding, Dr. Wakefield quoted Robert Louis Stevenson: “Sooner or later we all sit down to a banquet of consequences.”

Best regards,

Lee Euler,
Publisher

Keep Reading

View All Articles
Cheap, Easy Way To Get Your Cancer-Fighting Vitamins about false

Articles

Cheap, Easy Way To Get Your Cancer-Fighting Vitamins

One of the most frequently cited reasons for a poor diet is the cost of fresh produce, especially organic produce. I confess it gives me sticker shock, and I don’t know how anyone who’s not in the

Culinary Favorite Fights Cancer about false

Articles

Culinary Favorite Fights Cancer

No one quite knows how to classify this culinary favorite…Is it a spice? An herb? A vegetable? Or in a class of its own?Whatever you call it, it’s one of the world’s favorite foods AND it does more

The Dietary Supplement That’s Proven to Prevent Cancer about false

Articles

The Dietary Supplement That’s Proven to Prevent Cancer

Scientists are pointing to one supplement that can slash the risk of a variety of cancers in patients at high genetic risk.The scientists call the new findings “unexpected,” “exciting,” and “vitally